|
Below right is a graphic that show the actual path of last year's
Hurricane John. We then overlay the 5 computer models from a graphic
that the Weather Channel produces from data provided by the National
Hurricane Center. The evolution of the storm tracks is evident.
Initially the models predicted a wide range of storm tracks. As the
storm matured, and it's development became more predictable, the
eventuality of a Baja landfall becoming the consensus.
 |
|
The above graphic show the actual course of
Hurricane John in 2006. The projected paths of five of the
computer models that the NHC uses to derive it's forecast from
are then shown to evolve over the course of the storm. Note
how at various moments in the hurricane's life different
models were more accurately predicting the course of the
storm. |
As the storm developed there was plenty of chatter
about, here in La Paz, "...this model has it slamming into the
mainland." "No, that model has it moving harmlessly out to sea. I was
even sucked in, and at the expense of a great deal of time, compiled
the progressive animation of the computer forecasts that you now see
to the right. It struck me as strange, that with the information being
generated by the NHC, why I couldn't find this graphic representation
in public domain anywhere on the NHC site. Here is a little Insider
Information that will set you apart from this years pack of Chicken
Littles – The models are not intended to be viewed individually!
That's
right! The NHC uses 12 or more different models based on entirely
different mechanics. The Weather Channel graphic displays the favorite
5. The reality of storm history proves the consensus model we are
familiar with, shown left, is all the NHC really wants us to pay
attention to. In fact, here is what the NHC says about it from their
own website...
"The National Hurricane Center (NHC) does not generate a
graphic of the models it uses to produce its forecasts. We do this
because our past experience indicates such plots have confused users
and detracted from our final message, which is producing official
tropical cyclone forecasts and advisories. Some users have also become
too reliant in the individual forecast scenarios presented by the many
model forecast lines, some of which have little or no chance of being
correct. This is not the message the NHC wants to send."
SST Anomaly
|
 |
|
The colors represent deviation of this years
water temperatures from the norm. Green is normal, blue colder
than normal and yellow warmer than normal waters.
|
The models are built upon two different schemes and
blends of the two, statistical models and numerical models. The models
have become more sophisticated over the years, the newest of which
creates a three dimensional model of the global atmosphere. None of
these applications would run on your PC however. The GFDL model for
example is run on a Cray Supercomputer.
The most
trusted model at the NHC is the GFDL or Geophysical Fluid Dynamics
Laboratory developed at Princeton. GFDL is a numerical model with
hybrid modifications. Numerical models suffer from the way data points
are calculated, grid points are calculated at about 100 mile apart,
except on the best models. With a hurricane eye in the Eastern Pacific
ranging from 20 to 35 miles, the eye itself is below the resolution of
the model. Forecasters must then plug in a 'bogus vortex' so that the
model can then explain the weather phenomenon around the eye. GFDL
gets around this by generating more data points close to the storm,
giving the model higher 'resolution' for it's calculations around the
part of the weather you really care about THE STORM! However, focusing
more tightly can cause the model to 'miss' weather phenomenon more
distant, that could have an effect on the development or path of the
storm, particularly long term. Pure Numeric models treat each
hurricane like it's the first hurricane ever. Hybrid models combine
the regular pattern of storm behavior in the region into the mix.
SST Analysis
|
 |
|
Tropical cyclones thrive in waters
warmer than 26° C and degenerate in waters below that temp.
Areas south and east of the red line have the potential for a
tropical storm strike
|
In a discussion I had last year with the NHC
meteorologist he explained how this effects us here in Baja. The most
trusted models don't include the effects of land, in fact they see
Baja as a flat strip of land. The mountains and passes of Baja seemed
to have played a role in the course of two of our last three
hurricanes, Marty and John. These storms basically followed the same
path, up the spine of the mountains of Baja Sur.
The other type of modeling is statistical. Statistical
models compare the current storm behavior to every storm track
recorded, in great detail. The analogy author Pete Davies uses is that of
a storm being a steel bearing and all the previous storm tracks are
etchings on a piece of glass. The storm behaves on it's own, but is
likely to select one of the historical tracks as a guide.
Neither type of modeling provides the consistency the
NHC needs to keep from driving all of us crazy with warning on/
warning off predictions. Instead, the NHC uses a blend of these
models, ultimately interpreted by the forecaster that puts his name on
the forecast.
More below...
|